As my fellow NYU peers and I visited the college months ago
with the prospect of entering into this university, we were promised a ‘global’
education. We were told repeatedly that NYU is a ‘global’ university and is unique
in its goal to completely submerge its students into a global culture. In this
day of age, where with the help of technology and advances in communication the
globe has shrunk, being aware of the world globally is something that is
valued. To be educated in the cultures of other countries is something that has
become more and more important. However, as the world we live in becomes
increasingly globalized, there is a simultaneous homogenization of culture. Or
rather, as the globe becomes more connected, we can see a loss of unique
cultures that is being replaced with more American or western culture.
With
companies like Starbucks, Apple, and most notoriously McDonalds expanding to
other countries at an almost exponential rate, it is safe to say that there has
been some loss of local culture in places like China and India. In China, a
Starbucks even welcomes the “five million Chinese a year [who] visit theForbidden City”, an ancient Chinese palace. This sacred landmark of China, and remnants
of some of the most powerful dynasties ever to rule over China, has become yet
another casualty in the Americanization of cultures. The expansion of these big
name American companies, while profitable for America, is coming at the price
of something way more valuable: the true untarnished identity of other countries’
cultures. There was a time where traveling the globe meant experiencing other unadulterated
places, getting a new and completely different experience than you have ever
had before. However, now ‘traveling the world’ means going to Paris just to get
the same Big Mac you can get from the drive-thru three blocks from your house. It is truly amazing that in our global society
today, where an American CEO, a Scandinavian super model, and an Indian
computer technician can all be drinking virtually the same cup of coffee at the
same time, we still have such pressing issues as malnutrition and high illiteracy
rates in some of our most developed countries.
The
United States is practicing “cultural imperialism”, and subjecting less
developed countries to its restaurants, clothing companies, and entertainment
ventures. In January 2003, “American films accounted for approximately 80percent of global box office revenue”, a true testament to the homogenization
of culture, where people all over the globe want to watch and enjoy the same
movies. As a global society under one global culture we are not actively
creating new and unique ideas and concepts, but rather “old ideas are repeated
over and over again, in these media and thus culture is no longer characterized
by diversity but is reduced to the repetition of a relatively narrow spectrum
of forms and ideas” (Koval). With this Americanization of cultures we’ve seen
the disappearance of original ideas, almost as if nothing is truly “new” or “innovative”.
Although with a population of over seven billion people, there will never be
such thing as “one global culture”, it seems as if we are becoming a sea of
sameness- a population who wears the same brands, eats the same food, and likes
the same music. That is not to say there aren’t those who are opposed to this Americanization
of culture; In many places, especially in western Europe, there has been a
movement to oppose the coming of US big name companies and a boycott of places
like Starbucks and McDonalds. In Italy, for example, is one country whereStarbucks has yet to expand its global empire of coffeehouses. Many Europeans oppose
these big name companies because they recognize them for what they are: a
threat to local businesses and yet another sign of an Americanized world.
I’m
going to be honest here; I do not represent a citizen who is rallying for
global change. I fully partake and am a cog in our capitalist society, I drink Starbucks
every day (sometimes twice a day), I love to go shopping, and I even eat at
fast food chains like McDonalds (McFlurrys while they are ticking caloric time
bombs are delicious and hard to pass up). While it is easy to point out the
flaws of Americanization, it is even harder to fully separate yourself from
global imperialism. Although people complain about big name corporations, most
of us still wake up every morning craving an egg mcmuffin and a venti-non-fat-extra-whip-pumpkin-spice-expresso-soy
latte. We live in an extremely connected global society, where in the future
there will be global problems that we, global citizens, will be called upon to
answer.



Agreed! You have identified the problem of McDonaldization and acknowledge that you are a part of it, just as I am. As I was reading your post, the parts about homogenezation made me think of the post I did about transhumanism. Culturally and creatively, no one really wants homogenezation because it's boring! Transhumanism, though, would essentially erase diversity. Globalization, on the other hand, enhances homogenezation/McDonaldization while also enabling lesser known cultures to be brought into the fold. Interesting how different chapters can relate to each other.
ReplyDeleteThe point that you make in saying that even though you recognize the American "cultural imperialism," you still cannot escape the commodities that it provides us is a scary eye-opener. Are you suggesting that change is unlikely to occur in this matter and that we will become more accepting of the "imperialism" and more reliant on it?
ReplyDeleteYou make some very interesting points. In response to Meghan, i personally believe people will come to accept cultural imperialism and its crawling influence over the world. However, I feel the form that this "imperialism" takes will change over time. Perhaps it wont necessarily be "American" in the future.
ReplyDelete